The structure of financial markets is changing. Not in a loud or obvious way, but through a steady and irreversible shift. What was once considered the core of capital markets is becoming the periphery. What was once niche is now the foundation. Private markets are no longer alternatives. Public markets are no longer the only place where capital is formed. We are witnessing a full-scale reordering of the system.
For decades, the rule was simple. Public equities and bonds were the safe, liquid building blocks of any portfolio. Private investments were illiquid, opaque, and suitable only for institutional or ultra-high-net-worth investors. That model no longer reflects reality. Today, the difference between public and private is not about risk. It is about liquidity. And that liquidity is no longer worth what it used to be.
Public equities have become crowded and concentrated. A handful of stocks dominate major indices. Valuations are often detached from fundamentals. Passive flows chase market cap, not quality. The result is cheap beta. Easy access, low cost, but limited control. For real alpha, investors are looking elsewhere. They are going private.
At the same time, the number of publicly traded companies is shrinking. Twenty-five years ago, the US market had over 8,000 listed companies. Today it has less than half. This is not an accident. Companies are staying private longer. Many are choosing never to go public at all. The reason is simple. There is no longer a need.
Private capital is now available in size and at scale. Companies can raise billions without ever ringing a bell at the exchange. The capital is patient, customized, and aligned with long-term objectives. Founders do not need to answer to short-term traders or face the burden of quarterly disclosures. In many cases, the incentives to stay private outweigh the supposed prestige of going public.
This shift is structural. Not cyclical. Not temporary. It is being driven by the growing dominance of private capital providers. These are not just buyout firms. They are full-scale financial institutions. They originate loans, fund infrastructure, build real estate, and underwrite risk across the economy. They are stepping into roles once filled by traditional banks. But with more flexibility, more speed, and fewer regulatory constraints.
One firm at the center of this shift is Apollo. It is no longer just a private equity shop. It is a hybrid platform that manages insurance float, originates private credit, structures long-duration assets, and builds capital solutions for retirement accounts. Its leadership sees the future clearly. Public markets provide liquidity. Private markets provide alpha. A modern portfolio needs both. But the center of gravity is moving toward the private side.
This reordering has wide-reaching implications.
First, public markets will increasingly become beta markets. They will continue to serve a function. But that function will be access and liquidity, not differentiated returns. Investors looking for exposure to broad economic trends will use ETFs and index products. But those seeking idiosyncratic return streams, better downside protection, and long-term compounding will need to look at private structures.
Second, asset managers must adapt. The traditional 60/40 model is outdated. A more resilient portfolio may include one-third private credit, one-third public beta, and one-third active equity exposure across public and private markets. Liquidity will be viewed not as a default but as a cost. The question will not be how fast you can sell. It will be whether the asset itself compounds over time.
Third, capital formation is now happening behind the scenes. The real economy is being financed away from the spotlight. Renewable energy, logistics, data infrastructure, and health systems are increasingly built with private money. These are not speculative bets. They are long-duration assets that match the needs of pensions, insurers, and long-term investors. The public rarely sees this activity. But it defines the next generation of economic growth.
Fourth, investors need new skill sets. Understanding private markets is no longer optional. It requires learning how to assess underwriting quality, fund structures, liquidity terms, and alignment mechanisms. It also requires a shift in mindset. Illiquidity is not a flaw. It can be a feature. Especially if it allows you to own higher quality assets at lower entry prices.
Fifth, regulation will lag. As private markets absorb more capital and serve more core economic functions, the pressure for transparency will rise. But so will the innovation at the firm level. The most successful platforms will offer both institutional access and simplified wrappers for individuals. The public-private divide will blur. But the sophistication required to navigate it will only grow.
The shrinking public universe is not a temporary phenomenon. It reflects a permanent change in capital incentives. For companies, being public comes with costs and scrutiny. For many, those costs no longer make sense. When private financing is abundant, when strategic partners offer tailored capital, and when long-term alignment matters more than quarterly noise, the logic of staying private becomes self-reinforcing.
For long-term investors, this environment presents both a challenge and an opportunity. The challenge is that the old playbook no longer works. Buying an index and waiting is unlikely to deliver meaningful outperformance. The opportunity is that alpha is available. But it requires effort, patience, and access to private structures.
This shift also favors a certain kind of firm. Those that can originate their own assets, that can build scale across private equity and credit, that can manage insurance capital, and that can create investment products with built-in durability. These are not traditional asset managers. They are industrial-grade allocators of capital.
In this world, investing is no longer just about selecting stocks. It is about building exposure to systems. To infrastructure. To energy. To real estate. To long-term credit cycles. And doing so in a way that compounds through every market environment.
The future of financial markets is not a binary choice between public and private. It is a hybrid model. One that blends liquidity with long-term vision. One that accepts complexity in exchange for control. One that rewards those who understand that the best assets are not always the ones that are easiest to buy.
We are moving from a market of convenience to a market of intention. From index-driven allocation to precision-driven design. From speculation to structure.
For those who are willing to engage deeply, this new architecture offers a powerful opportunity. Not just for return, but for resilience. Not just for growth, but for ownership.
The structure of financial markets is being rebuilt. Quietly. Carefully. Permanently. And the investors who understand this shift today will be the ones who own tomorrow.
Interesting article, I certainly see your point about the challenge to public markets with more and more firms moving to private assets. However, the shift is also a function of how the regulatory burden and disclosure requirements have diverged dramatically between public and private. That divergence is arguably anti-competitive: smaller firms who might benefit from public capital are instead pushed into opaque financing models or remain dependent on VC/private equity ecosystems that can be extractive. Until there is greater transparency, some investors are likely to sit on the sidelines.
From a marcet build on depth to a marcet build on worth and Exklusivity. Greetings from another FJ specialised in Bitcoin structural analysis on multilayer.